The company must be in operation and have a business purpose
The company must have a business purpose which are stated in the company objectives and which are registered at the Business Registration Department. The company must commence business within a year from the date of registration and be considered in operation as a normal company (in practice this means start filing financial statements yearly) and keep accounts in accordance with the law. Money should pass through the company so the company will be actively trading and will not be liable for a Registrar’s application to strike off the register for being inactive (section 1246 Civil and Commercial Code).
The Land Offices have cross-checked companies holding land with the Department of Business Development. The Department of Business is aware which companies are likely 'land holding companies' and are aware that these companies are not running a real business. Their current attitude and policy is to ignore these companies, though the Thai attitude, buried deep in the official mind, is that foreigners have no right to own land.
The company may not have an illegal purpose
Setting up a company with the purpose to circumvent the laws restricting foreign ownership has an illegal purpose and will in court be deemed void pursuant to sections 150 and Section 172 of the Civil Code. The company can't be set up simply to circumvent the law or as a vehicle to hold land on behalf of the foreigner.
If the company is not carrying on business and its only purpose is holding land the company could be deemed holding company on behalf of the foreigner and the Land Department has in this case the authority to force the foreigner to dispose of such land. A partly foreign owned company using nominees will be regarded as a foreign company and therefore not allowed to own land.
Section 96 of the Land Code Act; 'When it appears that any person (including a juristic person) has acquired land as the owner in place of an alien or juristic person under the provisions of Section 97 and 98, the Director-General shall have the authority to dispose of such land and the provisions of Section 94 shall apply mutatis mutandis'.
Section 94 of the Land Code Act; 'All the land which an alien has acquired unlawfully or without permission shall be disposed of by such alien within the time limit prescribed by the Director-General which shall not be less than one hundred eighty days nor more than one year. If the land is not disposed of within the time prescribed the Director-General shall have the power to dispose of it. The provisions on the forced sale of land in chapter 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis'.
 |
Many of the local property law and accounting offices in the tourist areas of Thailand aiming their services at foreigners and suggesting loopholes in the law for the foreigner have the same interest as the real estate agents and fully depend for their income on property sales and/ or have a direct interest in the real estate market. Can you trust them? Not really. It is not using a loophole when you transfer land to a 100% Thai owned company and the next day transfer 49% or 39% of the (preference) shares to the foreigner. If the company uses nominees (currently defined in the Land Office guidelines and Business registration rules) or is not in operation and/ or set up to circumvent the law the foreigner will be violating the law and could on investigation at a later date be forced to sell the land and will be liable for severe penalties. The only reason to set up the company without a foreign shareholding is because on investigation the Thai shareholders in the company will be deemed nominee shareholders, acting on behalf of the foreigner! Registration would not be allowed.
Section 100 Land Code Act:' If a juristic person who acquired land while not within the scope of the provisions of Section 97 and 98 (meaning foreign), but later comes within their scope, the provisions of Section 95 shall apply mutatis mutandis' . This means that on investigation at a later date the foreigner must dispose of the land and section 94 of the Land Code Act shall apply.
Some advice structures that include holding companies as shareholders, Thai nationals as directors and foreigners having control via majority Thai owned companies over the Thai juristic entity that will own the property or several lease buyers having equal shares in one holding company. Despite the complicated lengths (with associated fees) some will go to suggest a way around the law, it is all doubtful if not an illegal nominee structure. You may find out that these as sound presented property investment structures are in fact illegal.
 |
The recent land registration rules from the Land Department and Ministry of Interior must effectively prevent the use of nominee structured limited companies by foreigners for land purchase. Though, local land officials may turn a blind eye because of corruption and pressure from leading figures with a financial interest in the property market. The law is actually applied in different ways and you could say that because of corruption on a local level the law and latest regulations are not fully enforced. It is well known that several high-end officials were involved in land transactions and/or have a direct financial interest in the property market. Just look at the alleged involvement of Thai Rak Thai politicians in forest encroachment and land speculation on the Samui island or a recent Samui land scam involving government men and ranking civil servants. There are many more examples where the officials who must apply the law allow a breach of the law because they have a financial interest in the deal where land is in fact sold to foreign investors operating through a Thai company.
This latest policy change by the government is not the closing or removing of a loophole but enforcement of existing laws. Even though offered by local law and accounting firms, setting up companies with nominee shareholders to own land on behalf of foreigners is and always has been an unlawful evasion of the law. Law enforcement and procedures may change rapidly in Thailand and selective or poor law enforcement in the past is no guarantee for the future.
|